Tag Archives: App Store

Microsoft pays “$100,000 or more” to get devs coding for Windows Phone

Windows Phone is a hard-sell effort for developers, but Microsoft has the goods to make it worth their while.

Microsoft is paying developers up to $100,000 to get their applications over to the Windows Phone 8 platform, according to a report from Bloomberg Businessweek. This is in addition to a promotion the company is running where it will pay any developer to get their app into the Windows Store ASAP in an effort to catch up to the iOS and Android app stores.

Microsoft first instated the broad $100 Visa card reward in March, offering the bounty to any developer or studio that managed to get its app in by June 30. The rewards were capped at $2,000 per developer.

But Microsoft has even more money to throw at the problem of an underpopulated app store. Sources speaking to Bloomberg said that Microsoft has “been offering $100,000 or more” to companies for building Windows phone apps. Windows Phone chief marketing officer Thom Gruhler told Bloomberg that the store now contains 48 of the 50 most-downloaded apps across all platforms, with Pinterest and Instagram as the holdouts.

Read 1 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Apple expanding its crackdown on app discovery apps

Apps that act as a skin for shopping for other apps appear to be at new risk of getting the business end of Apple’s banhammer.
Casey Johnston

Apple has ramped up its crackdown on apps that function as discovery mechanism for other apps, according to a report from PocketGamer. The company is citing regulation 2.25 from its App Store rules, which ban apps that could be mistaken by customers as app stores in their own right.

The crackdown seems to have started in April, when an app called AppGratis was rejected from the App Store. AppGratis was a vector for paid distribution where developers could place their applications and pay to have them mentioned via push notifications.

AppGratis was rejected because apps that promote products other than the developer’s own are against the rules, as are push notifications used for marketing. (Originally, AppGratis was approved and then later rejected, which is what caused the controversy last month.) Now more developers are reporting rejections from the App Store because of regulation 2.25, including the Tapjoy network and AppShopper.

Read 1 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Apple Tightens The Noose On Apps For Recommending Apps, Going After Sharing And Search Tools

appstore-(1)

Apple has recently taken action against apps that violate clause 2.25 of its App Review Guidelines according to PocketGamer, a rule that says no app should replicate functionality of the App Store in order to promote or offer for purchase apps other than your own.

The rules recently saw two high-profile app removals, including AppGratis and AppShopper (which subsequently returned after changes were made) but more could follow as Apple is not also reportedly rejecting apps that replication App Store search features, as well as social network sharing of app recommendations.

A rejection supplied to PocketGamer by a developer shows Apple citing apps that “include filtering, bookmarking, searching or sharing recommendations” as not being distinct enough from the App Store itself to pass muster with Apple. Apple doesn’t include provisions around filtering, bookmarking, searching or sharing in the actual wording of clause 2.25 itself, but it was apparently spelled out pretty clearly in the email.

The app developer which spoke to PocketGamer wished to remain anonymous, which is probably because it hopes to work to get its app back in the store. AppShopper managed to secure a return after repurposing its app as more of a social network around mobile software than a pure app recommendation and discovery tool.

The extension of the guidelines to include a much more broad category of apps, including ones that do little but let users share recommendations with friends might seem a little unusual coming from Apple, since these fuel its own app economy. But there are multiple problems with giving developers free rein to build their own App Store clones and complimentary tools: Apple potentially loses control of the shopping experience and confuses customers; charts and ranking systems become subject to outside forces with different motivations other than surfacing the best content; social recommendations run the risk of looking like spam to users instead of something worthwhile.

Running a store of any kind well depends upon customers trusting you, and feeling that you won’t abuse that trust. It’s true that maintaining an affiliate network helps Apple drive app sales, but it has to be very careful that that network stays fair of consumer expectations, and guideline 2.25 is a way to help Apple keep companies toeing that line.

In other words, it’s a finesse tool, not a bludgeoning instrument, and while we’ll probably see more apps fall, this is probably about getting developers to focus where Apple needs them to be rather than about implementing a blanket ban.

Barnes and Noble reinvigorates Nooks with access to Google Play store

One new small icon has huge meaning for Barnes and Nobles’ Nook line.

The Nook HD and Nook HD+ e-readers now have access to the full Google Play store, according to a press release Friday from Barnes and Noble. The move knocks down a major wall between Barnes and Noble’s products and their status as real, fully formed Android tablets, putting them a step ahead of competitor Amazon’s Kindle Fires.

The Nook HD and HD+ were released last fall as 7-inch and 9-inch devices, respectively, running a heavily modified, forked version of Android 4.0. The products occupied a similar space to Amazon’s Kindle Fires and had access to Nook Apps, which were separate and distinct from conventional Android apps.

As of Friday, Nook HD and Nook HD+ owners will be able to receive the Google Play store as a “major upgrade to [the] software” and gain access to the 700,000 apps and boodles of content therein. Barnes and Noble further states that both products will now ship with the Google Play store preinstalled.

Read 1 remaining paragraphs | Comments

StatusBoard to Longform to Mail Pilot: 5 iOS apps to check out this weekend

After a few weeks off from the weekend iOS app roundup, we’re back. A handful of new and updated apps caught our eye this week, with selections for people who are into e-mail, displaying data, long-form articles, crazy videos, and check-ins. If you’re bored with your iOS apps lately, check out the five below for something to hopefully stir your enthusiasm.

StatusBoard ($9.99)

StatusBoard is a new app from the renown Mac and iOS devs at Panic, geared towards companies and small businesses who want to see lots of relevant data in one, easy-on-the-eyes interface. What kind of data? According to Panic, you could display nearly anything: support data, news feeds, tweets, sales info, active projects, your inbox count… the list is practically endless.

In addition to being able to display this data on your iPad or iPhone, you can also AirPlay it to a device like the Apple TV or even just display the data via your device’s TV-out (with an in-app upgrade). This means you can share it all on the bigscreen regularly so everyone in your shared office can glance at what’s going on.

Read 9 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Instructure Launches App Center To Let Teachers, Students Install Third-Party Apps Across Learning Platforms

Screen Shot 2013-04-05 at 10.40.54 AM

Props are owed to companies like Blackboard and Moodle for being early movers in the educational software space, particularly in helping catalyze innovation in learning management systems (LMS). The problem is, of course, they began over a decade ago and there haven’t exactly been a flurry of raving reviews since. Blackboard has continued to expand its suite of tools, and the ever-growing-features of LMSes Sakai and Desire2Learn are finding bigger and bigger audiences. The Salt Lake City-based Instructure launched Canvas in 2011 to give colleges and universities a more modern, cloud-based alternative.

Taking cues from Moodle, Instructure designed Canvas to be open source to let third-parties contribute to create more rapid development and bug fixes, while going one step further by avoiding Flash, offering a mobile product, APIs and scalable hosting. But, traditionally, the problem has been that EdTech has yet to become an ecosystem, CEO Josh Coates says, and integrations and APIs are few and far between.

Meanwhile, schools want to know what learning tools are out there, but they don’t want to do the work themselves. In response, Instructure is today announcing Canvas App Center — an app library built around its LMS that will allow teachers, administrators and students to install third-party apps in Canvas with one click that will be widely released in June. But what seems to have broader application is its independent open apps site, which is available now, offers over 100 apps, including WordPress, Khan Academy, Dropbox and Evernote, and allows users to install them on a slew of learning platforms and tools.

The apps are free to install, though some may require a subscription with the publisher or vendor, but Instructure won’t be brokering that relationship in any way — or taking a commission, Coates says. The App Center, in the familiar way of app stores, gives students and teachers an easy way to find, install, rate and review apps. The other nifty feature of the App Center is that includes an algorithm that recommends apps based on user preference, the institution and their previous activity.

Today, more than five million teachers and students at over 350 institutions use Canvas as their LMS, which immediately provides scale to the App Center and gives those third-parties a whole new distribution system and potential audience. They also have to be compelled by the fact that Instructure won’t be taking commissions on App Center installs — as will schools. The less teachers and schools have to worry about pricing and cost, the less friction there is, the more installs.

Business-wise, it may not seem like the best strategy, but Coates says that Instructure is focused on building an educational platform — not a one-dimensional product, but a service that includes integrations, APIs, a community and an ecosystem. That’s why the company has made its open library LTI extensions available to the public — now any third-party can add apps to the open resource which should work in most learning management systems.

How many other educational software providers can say that? Not many. InBloom is trying to do this for educational data, but they’re a non-profit, almost a consortium of public/private/startup interests. Not only is it unusual to see a for-profit company take the high road like this (a wink to Google), I think most would agree that it’s the right move for education — in that it helps the sytem take steps toward becoming an ecosystem. That is, if all parties involved in education could ever make a decision collectively, beyond “we need more money and teachers and maybe technology” or “you need to help my child.”

A perfect example: Here’s open educational data initiative InBloom. Here’s a description of people/parents not even being able to agree on InBloom. Yes, startups, someone in education will fight you and the medicine you’re trying to put down its throat. Smile and do it anyway.

“We want to tear down the walled garden that has plagued the LMS market,” Instructure co-founder and CPO Brian Whitmer said. “Third party integrations have existed, but they’ve required the IT
department to make them work. With Canvas App Center, we want to let anyone install an app with one click and begin personalizing their learning experience with these tools.”

I’m sure someone will find a reason to object, though. Because, hey, no good deed goes unpunished. Especially in education.

French junior minister says Apple was “brutal” with AppGratis

France is not happy with the way Apple unceremoneously ejected an app called AppGratis from the iOS App Store, calling the move “extremely brutal and unilateral.” The comments came from French Junior Minister for Digital Economy Fleur Pellerin, according to Reuters, who made a visit to AppGratis publisher iMediapp before stating that she would ask the European Commission to tighten up its regulations on how Internet companies handle their digital platforms.

“This behaviour is not worthy of a company of this size,” Pellerin said in reference to Apple. Because this kind of “repeated abusive behavior,” Pellerin feels the EU needs to take a look at how tech companies handle their search, social, and online platforms.

AppGratis, an app that focused on highlighting other apps available on the App Store, was removed from Apple’s market earlier this week for violating sections 2.25 and 5.6 in Apple’s App Store Review Guidelines. The company said it had previously worked with its contacts at Apple to get approval, but Apple decided later on that the violations—which included promoting other apps within its own app and sending push notifications to promote those apps—were too much to bear. Inside sources hinted that this was just a sign of things to come: Apple is supposedly cracking down on apps like AppGratis throughout the App Store in an attempt to clean up some of the skeevier behavior from app developers.

Read 1 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Apple not blocking comics with gay sex from the App Store after all

Apple apparently did not ban a Saga comic being published through the ComiXology iOS app over “two postage-stamp sized images of gay sex.” Instead, it was the folks behind ComiXology itself who declined to publish the comic based on an assumption that Apple would frown on it, according to a new blog post published by ComiXology.

Allegations spread like wildfire on Tuesday that Apple had cracked down on illustrated depictions of gay sex while allowing similar depictions of heterosexual sex in the past. Saga creator Brian K. Vaughan wrote a blog post on the topic yesterday, claiming that Apple had decided to flat-out ban the publication of Saga issue #12—which is currently available through Apple’s iBookstore—and explained where users could find the issue outside of Apple’s app store. He also pushed his own digital comics site, “which remains 100% uncensored by corporate overlords.”

Observers got swept up in the hubbub, largely because there was a simultaneous hubbub over another app called AppGratis that had been removed from the iOS App Store for violating several App Store guidelines (like pushing marketing from within the app, for example). But, as it turns out, the outrage over Saga was misplaced, as clarified by ComiXology’s David Steinberger

Read 3 remaining paragraphs | Comments