Man ‘in love’ drives through airport

A Russian drunk driver who rammed his way into Kazan International Airport terminal in Russia said he was meeting a lady friend.

Treasury Rebuffs Democratic Senators’ Plan To Help Disabled Americans With Student Debt

WASHINGTON ― The Treasury Department has rejected a request by congressional Democrats to guarantee that impoverished, severely disabled Americans will not face a tax penalty for discharging student debt, according to an aide to a Democratic senator who had been advocating the measure.

Treasury representatives on Wednesday informed the staff of several Democratic senators that the department wouldn’t issue the “guidance” ― language clarifying its interpretation of tax law ― that Democrats requested, said the aide, who would only speak on condition of anonymity. Instead, Treasury officials discussed two alternative approaches that the Internal Revenue Service or Department of Education could enact, but failed to lay out a timeline or make a compelling case that the measures would be as effective as action by Treasury, according to the aide.

“After months of work, it was a big and disappointing loss,” the aide said.

These Democratic members of Congress for months had been asking Treasury to officially declare that Americans with student debt who are eligible for the “Total and Permanent Disability” loan discharge ― a category of borrowers with especially severe disabilities ― would not risk an income-tax penalty. Otherwise, there is a chance that the discharged loan would count as income subject to taxation, costing already-impoverished borrowers a potentially significant sum, they noted.

A Treasury spokesman did not dispute the aide’s account.

“The Obama Administration has repeatedly urged Congress to enact legislative changes to address the possible tax consequences of loan forgiveness faced by these borrowers, as well as others with student loans,” Treasury spokesman Rob Runyan said in a statement. “Congress has not yet enacted these legislative changes. Treasury continues to work with the Department of Education to evaluate possible alternatives that could address the situations faced by these borrowers‎.”

Borrowers qualify for the “Total and Permanent Disability” loan discharge if they receive Social Security Disability Insurance or Supplemental Security Income benefits, and the Social Security Administration has given them the designation “medical improvement not expected,” meaning recovery is highly unlikely. They must also earn no more than the federal poverty level for a family of two ― about $16,000 a year in 2016.

The Department of Education announced in April that it would try to make it easier for these severely disabled borrowers to obtain debt forgiveness by notifying them of their eligibility. Working with the Social Security Administration, the department identified 387,000 severely disabled borrowers eligible for the forgiveness.

The Democrats began working behind the scenes to encourage Treasury to write the guidance protecting these struggling borrowers from a burdensome IRS tax. Frustrated by months of fruitless discussion, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) sent a private letter to Treasury Secretary Jack Lew and IRS Commissioner John Koskinen.

“Treasury’s failure to provide guidance will impose an extraordinary compliance burden on Social Security beneficiaries with total and permanent disabilities, while also triggering unnecessary administrative burdens on both the IRS and the ED,” Warren wrote in the Oct. 7 letter.

After months of work, it was a big and disappointing loss.
Democratic Senate aide

The Congressional Progressive Caucus sent Lew a letter this month asking for the guidance.

Warren noted in the letter that most borrowers eligible for “total and permanent disability” loan discharge undoubtedly meet Treasury’s definition of “insolvency,” which applies to borrowers with debts exceeding assets. Under current tax law, Treasury must exempt a loan discharge amount from being counted as income for tax purposes if the borrower meets this definition of insolvency.

The average student loan burden of workers who would be affected by the guidance is about $18,000, according to a calculation the Department of Education performed for Warren that she included in her letter. The median net worth of people receiving Supplemental Security Income and Social Security Disability insurance is $1,500, according to an analysis conducted by the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College at Warren’s behest.

In addition, Warren observed in the letter, the Social Security Administration estimated in 2014 that 84 percent of the narrower category of severely disabled workers with the designation “medical improvement not expected” had no annual earnings.

“During the meeting they conceded that roughly two-thirds of these borrowers, who are already known to be in poverty, are also insolvent, but rejected the idea of providing guidance to even this subset of borrowers,” the Democratic Senate aide said.

Treasury’s failure to act means these impoverished, disabled borrowers will have to navigate IRS rules on their own. The IRS is likely to determine that the discharged loan was not a form of income, since the vast majority of the borrowers are insolvent.

But the borrowers may face an automatic audit, pushing them to engage expensive tax advisory services and experience great personal stress.

“Ultimately, given the costs of filing and the potential risks of garnishment, additional tax credits, or other federal and state benefits, the streamlined loan discharge process could leave borrowers who are totally and permanently disabled even worse off than before their loan was discharged,” Warren wrote in the letter.

Treasury has already issued guidance this year exempting certain kinds of loan discharges from counting toward taxable income for two far less vulnerable categories of borrowers: real estate investors and grantor trusts.

The Treasury spokesman didn’t respond to HuffPost’s request for an explanation why it was possible to exclude those types of discharged debts from taxable income, but not the outstanding student debt of impoverished people with disabilities.

Treasury’s rejection of Warren’s proposal comes amid mounting evidence that student debt is worsening elderly poverty.

In 2015 alone, the federal government garnished 110,000 seniors’ Social Security benefits to pay off student loans on which they had already defaulted, according to a Government Accountability Office study requested by Warren and Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) that came out this week. Some 70,000 Americans over 50 live in poverty as their Social Security benefits are cut to pay off student debts, the report found.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The EPA Knows How To Prevent The Next Flint. Will A Trump EPA Do It?

It is becoming increasingly clear that many of the conditions that contributed to the ongoing water crisis in Flint, Michigan, are also present in thousands of communities throughout the United States.

A new Reuters analysis of lead testing results across the U.S. published this week found nearly 3,000 communities with poisoning rates that were actually double those of Flint at the height of its contamination crisis. 

Lead poisoning is not solely attributable to water, of course — paint and industrial waste are other sources — but the nation’s rapidly deteriorating water infrastructure and a lack of proper testing and oversight of water systems aren’t helping matters. 

A separate investigation by USA Today released earlier this month similarly found that 4 million Americans living in small, rural communities were drinking water that might be contaminated with lead due to testing that their utilities either skipped or did not carry out adequately. 

The Environmental Protection Agency, which has been widely criticized for playing a significant role in the Flint crisis, appears to be aware of the ways in which it has not lived up to its duty of enforcing both the Clean Water Act and Safe Drinking Water Act, which are intended to protect the nation’s water.

Late last month, the EPA issued a comprehensive “action plan” on its drinking water policies. The report lays out extensive plans to build capacity for water infrastructure improvements, to improve oversight of the Safe Drinking Water Act and to reduce the risk of lead exposure. 

Environmentalists and safe water advocates like Harry Henderson, director of the Natural Resources Defense Council, were encouraged by the plan.

“This is an example of the EPA doing what it needs to do, taking a strong national leadership position in framing how we move forward,” Henderson told HuffPost. “And that needs to be understood by whoever sits in the chair of administrator of the EPA.”

President-elect Donald Trump’s selection for that position, Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt, has made Henderson skeptical about whether the agency under his leadership, if he is confirmed, will take action on key components of the plan.

One priority area of the plan centers on strengthening the protection of the source waters of drinking water. Pruitt has been one of the most vocal opponents to one of the agency’s efforts to accomplish just that, the “waters of the U.S.” Clean Water Rule.

Last year, Pruitt sued the EPA on the matter of the rule, which is intended to clarify which waterways are legally protected under the Clean Water Act, just one of several times he has sued the agency he may soon lead.

Such an action runs contrary to what Henderson described as a clear need for “an effective cop on the beat” to address the nation’s drinking water challenges.

Henderson fears a failure to take such an approach at the federal level rather than leaving such matters in states’ hands — as Pruitt has advocated for in his EPA lawsuits — would likely result in further water crises.

“In Flint, we see what happens when a passive EPA ‘leaves things to the states,’” Henderson said. “Mr. Pruitt’s suggestion of increased deference to states as opposed to understanding the critical intersection of federal standards and oversight to ensure the enforcement of the law is a recipe for continued decline and disaster.”

The real impact the EPA’s plan may have is also in question given Trump’s repeated threats to dismantle the agency. If the EPA’s funding is reduced, it will likely not be able to carry out much, if any, of the plans it contains.

If Henderson sees some hope in the new administration’s water policy plans, it may lie in Trump’s call for the nation to improve its infrastructure.

The president-elect spoke often of his support for “crystal clear, crystal clean” water prior to the election, and his campaign website features a call to triple funding for state revolving loan fund programs that support states’ and municipalities’ efforts to upgrade their water systems.

And while such an investment in water infrastructure could make a huge impact on water utilities, the proof, Henderson noted, remains in the pudding.

“We have this opportunity now but we have to get it right,” he added. “There are ways in which large-scale public works projects can get it right and ways in which they can exacerbate significant declines. It’s all in the details.”


Joseph Erbentraut covers promising innovations and challenges in the areas of food and water. In addition, Erbentraut explores the evolving ways Americans are identifying and defining themselves. Follow Erbentraut on Twitter at @robojojo. Tips? Email

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

BRIEF-Laramide Resources increases financing and provides update

* Increased size of non-brokered private placement from up
to 12 million units to up to 14.5 million units of co at C$0.30
per unit

STORY WITHDRAWAL: London court says Turkish trustees have no claim on alleged Gulen-linked firm’s UK asset

LONDON (Reuters) – This story has been withdrawn. The story was based on a ruling that was not a final judgment. There will be no substitute story.